Orphaned Babies Show Hormone Disruption Years after Adoption

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Orphans have a hard lot in life, particularly in Eastern Europe, where state institutions sometimes provide care that has been reduced to simple feeding and changing with a minimum of physical contact. That neglect--even without any other abuse--can take a profound emotional and physical toll, potentially deeply affecting a child's neurobiology. New research shows that children adopted from such institutions who have spent as many as three years in their new homes still suffer from depressed levels of hormones that have been linked to bonding, caring, communicating and stress regulation, among other things.

Alison Wismer Fries and her colleagues at the University of Wisconsin-Madison compared 21 typical youngsters from Milwaukee to 18 children who had been adopted by Milwaukee area residents after spending their first year or so in Romanian and Russian orphanages. Using urine samples, they found that the adopted orphans had significantly lower levels of vasopressin--a hormone that plays a role in familial recognition--circulating in their systems than their peers.

The scientists then had the two groups of children play an interactive computer game with their mothers and, later, an unfamiliar woman. The 30-minute game involved timed "tickling, patting on the head, counting each other's fingers, [and] whispering in each other's ears." Studies in animals have shown that such pleasant physical contact leads to a rise in oxytocin levels--a hormone that seems to help form secure relationships--particularly when the touch comes from a relative. Although the family-reared children showed the expected rise in oxytocin levels when touched by their mothers, the orphans did not exhibit as strong a response.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We had a rare opportunity to examine children who were reared in extremely aberrant social environments where they were deprived of the kind of care-giving typical for our species," the authors report online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. "The results of this experiment suggest a potential mechanism whose atypical function may explain the perverse social and emotional difficulties observed in many children who have experienced aberrant caregiving."

The researchers caution that this does not mean that these children are functionally incapable of forming healthy relationships, but note that the findings may explain why such orphans show an affinity for comfort from strangers or difficulties developing friendships, among other potential challenges. "All we are saying is that in the case of some social problems, here is a window into understanding the biological basis for why they happen and how we might design treatments," team leader Seth Pollak says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe